Everyone's selling agents. But you need more than that. You need an Accomplice. We build your agent with you. Weekly calls, hands-on setup, and a real person on the other end accountable for keeping it running and improving.
You haven't set up an AI agent yet because you don't have the time. And you don't have the time because you haven't set up an AI agent yet.
An inbox can triage itself now. A draft can be ready before you ask for it. A follow-up can get chased without you remembering to chase it. None of that is the hard part anymore.
The hard part is the hour it takes to pick the right tools, the afternoon to wire them into what you actually use, and the standing job of keeping them working when something breaks at 6am on a Tuesday. That hour and that afternoon are exactly what you don't have — which is why the agent stays a tab you meant to get back to.
This isn't a prompt problem. It's a time problem. Most "we tried an agent" projects don't die because the model failed — they die because nobody had a spare afternoon that week, or the next one.
We are that afternoon. Every week, for as long as it takes.
Before it was a business, it was my own infrastructure. That's still the proof I point to first.
Three dedicated, always-on agents of my own — not a slide, a track record:
Runs on a Mac mini that's genuinely on, all day, every day — not opened when needed. Answers my phone line, runs a Teams bot, does real work with nobody restarting it.
A second, independent machine, doing a different job for my actual work. Proof this is a pattern I can repeat for you, not a fluke I got lucky with once.
Extended out past the browser to drive physical hardware, including a robot arm. If your work doesn't stay on a screen, I've already built for that.
What my three agents handled, in a normal week
Structured calls, not a questionnaire. We find what's actually costing you time — not what sounds impressive to automate.
Built around how you already work, configured by us, not you. Dedicated hardware if you want a box in the room; most run cloud-hosted.
No ticket queue, no support rotation. One person accountable when something needs a judgment call.
New requests get built in, not filed away for later. Add your EA or your directs once the trust is there.
Every "AI pilot" dies the same way — the demo goes well, the follow-up invite doesn't get sent, and six weeks later nobody remembers to check on it. We build the recurring call into the offer itself, so that doesn't happen here.
| Phase | Cadence | What the call is for |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1–4 | Weekly, ~20 min | Discovery-heavy — where most of the value gets designed in. |
| Months 2–6 | Biweekly, ~15 min | Maintenance and new requests. It's running; we're expanding it. |
| Steady state | Monthly, or on request | Light touch-base once things are stable. The point is giving you time back. |
| Team accounts | Split by role | Exec gets a monthly check-in. Whoever delegates day to day keeps the working cadence. |
Onboarding calls are mandatory, not optional. They're how we find what's actually worth automating, and skipping them is how every other agent project stalls. After 90 days, cadence tapers to on-request.
Same short agenda every time: what it handled, what still felt like busywork, what's new, what needed a judgment call. This is what having an Accomplice actually means — not a tool you check on, a person checking in.
A retainer, not an hourly project. The first month is calibration — the work that makes the other five worth it.
We keep a small number of active accounts on purpose — this is hands-on work for one person to be accountable for, not a queue. If the price doesn't fit yet, tell us anyway. We'd still like to hear what you're solving.
Not a demo. A conversation about what you'd actually delegate, if you trusted it to get done.
Talk to us